Bugg v. Knowles

127 S.E. 813, 33 Ga. App. 710, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 699
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 15, 1925
Docket16049
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 127 S.E. 813 (Bugg v. Knowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bugg v. Knowles, 127 S.E. 813, 33 Ga. App. 710, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 699 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. A boy fourteen years of age is presumptively chargeable with the same standard of diligence for his own safety as an adult. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Hartley, 25 Ga. App. 110 (6) (103 S. [711]*711E. 259); Paulk v. Lee, 31 Ga. App. 629 (2) (121 S. E. 845); Central R. Co. v. Phillips, 91 Ga. 526 (2) (17 S. E. 952); Muscogee Mfg. Co. v. Butts, 21 Ga. App. 558 (1) (94 S. E. 821); Jones v. Georgia &c. Ry. Co., 103 Ga. 570 (1) (29 S. E. 927); Roberts v. Porter Mfg. Co., 110 Ga. 474 (35 S. E. 674); Stringer v. Atlanta Box Factory, 25 Ga. App. 341 (1) (103 S. E. 421).

Decided April 15, 1925.

2. Tliis case, in respect to all questions raised by the "general demurrer, is controlled by the decision of the Supremo Court in Lowe v. Payne, 156 Ga. 312 (121 S. E. 812), and the decision recently rendered by this court in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Fulford, ante, 631, in which last-named case one of the rulings here applicable was predicated upon instructions received from the Supreme Court in answer to questions certified. The petition when fairly construed does not allege a wilful or wanton killing. The defendant being charged with negligence only, and the petition disclosing that the decedents voluntarily sat down upon the railroad-track and there remained until they fell asleep, it affirmatively appears that they were guilty of such negligence or failure to exercise 'Care for their safety as to bar a recovery for their homicide. Eor this reason the petition was subject to the general demurrer interposed. See, in this connection, Southwestern Railroad v. Hankerson, 61 Ga. 114; Wilds v. Brunswick & Western R. Co., 82 Ga. 667 (9 S. E. 595); Central R. Co. v. Smith, 87 Ga. 694 (3 S. E. 397); Southern Ry. Co. v. Hogan, 131 Ga. 157 (1) (62 S. E. 64).

3. Since it is held that the judge erred in overruling the general demurrer, it is unnecessary to examine or pass upon the special demurrers. Columbus R. Co. v. City Mills Co., 135 Ga. 626 (4) (70 S. E. 242); Dellinger v. Elm City Cotton Mills, 26 Ga. App. 780 (107 S. E. 264).

Judgment reversed.

Stephens, J., concurs. Bell, J., disqualified. I. J. Bussell, Larry E. Pedrick, Wilson & Bennett, for plaintiff in error. E. II. Williams, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. Jenkins
155 S.E.2d 763 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Redding v. Morris
123 S.E.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Lassiter v. Poss
70 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
The DRAGON CORPORATION v. Syphers
70 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
43 S.E.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Martin v. State
37 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Greeson v. Davis
9 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Haynesworth v. Hall Construction Co.
163 S.E. 273 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Leverett v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
142 S.E. 905 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Henson v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
129 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 813, 33 Ga. App. 710, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugg-v-knowles-gactapp-1925.