Jones v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Railway Co.
This text of 29 S.E. 927 (Jones v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A passenger, though a minor of about the age of sixteen years, who voluntarily alighted from a moving train, was not entitled to a recovery from the railroad company for .injuries thus sustained, it not appearing that he was directed so to do by any agent or servant of the company, but that, in consequence of a fear that he would be carried beyond his station, he took upon himself the risk of leaving the train in this man[571]*571ner. This is so even though the train was running at a speed which indicated that it would pass the station in question without stopping. If the train was moving so rapidly as to make leaving it unsafe, the plaintiff’s injury was caused by his own voluntary act in taking a dangerous risk; if not, then the injury must have resulted from a mere accident, or from the plaintiff’s own carelessness in getting off. Barnett v. Bast Tern. By. Co., 87 Ga. 766.
2. Under the facts alleged, the court committed no error in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.E. 927, 103 Ga. 570, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-georgia-carolina-northern-railway-co-ga-1898.