Dellinger v. Elm City Cotton Mills
This text of 107 S.E. 264 (Dellinger v. Elm City Cotton Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the Civil Code (1910), § 4424, which provides that “ a mother, or, if no mother, a father, may recover for the homicide of a child, minor or sui juris, upon whom she or he is dependent, or who contributes to his or her support,” the right to bring the action is primarily in the mother, and the father has no right of action if the mother is in life when the homicide occurs. Therefore, when a father brings a suit for the homicide of his son, to recover damages for the full value of the son’s life, and the petition fails to allege that the mother was dead at the time of the homicide, no cause of action is shown in the father. Eor this reason the petition in this case was properly dismissed on demurrer. Direction is given that the plaintiff be allowed to amend the petition by making the necessary allegation as to the death of the mother. Bilbro v. Jones, 102 Ga. 161 (29 S. E. 118) ; Robinson v. Georgia Railroad Co., 117 Ga. 168 (43 S. E. 452, 60 L. R. A. 555, 97 Am. St. Rep. 156) ; Frazier v. Georgia R. Co., 96 Ga. 785 (22 S. E. 936).
The assignments of error as to the judgment on the special demurrers are not passed upon.
Judgment affirmed uRth direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 264, 26 Ga. App. 780, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellinger-v-elm-city-cotton-mills-gactapp-1921.