Bryant v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 784 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cedric BRYANT, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Cedric Bryant, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation and the sentence imposed. We remand, however, for entry of a written order specifically listing the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated as no such order appears in the record. See Batten v. State, 589 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Affirmed, but remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 784, 1997 WL 20730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.