Palacios v. State
This text of 706 So. 2d 1382 (Palacios v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 624 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Griffin v. State, 603 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Harris v. State, 610 So.2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); § 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). We remand, however, for entry of a written order specifically listing the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. See, et., [1383]*1383Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed, but remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 1382, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916, 1998 WL 131222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palacios-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.