Palacios v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Palacios v. State

706 So. 2d 1382, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916, 1998 WL 131222

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1998·No. No. 97-1765·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 624 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Griffin v. State, 603 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Harris v. State, 610 So.2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); § 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). We remand, however, for entry of a written order specifically listing the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. See, et., [1383]*1383Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed, but remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 624 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Griffin v. State, 603 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Harris v. State, 610 So.2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); § 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). We remand, however, for entry of a written order specifically listing the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. See, et., [1383]*1383Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed, but remanded.

Palacios v. State, 706 So. 2d 1382, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916, 1998 WL 131222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

706 So. 2d 1382 (Palacios v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related