Bingham v. State

719 So. 2d 1032, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898, 1998 WL 771535
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 1998
DocketNo. 98-728
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 So. 2d 1032 (Bingham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bingham v. State, 719 So. 2d 1032, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898, 1998 WL 771535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand for the trial court to reduce to writing its reasons and the evidence relied upon for the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Salvatierra v. State, 691 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Because this will be purely a ministerial act, appellant’s presence will be unnecessary. See Culliver v. State, 693 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Boggs v. State, 557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mosley v. State
735 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 So. 2d 1032, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898, 1998 WL 771535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.