Culliver v. State
This text of 693 So. 2d 1152 (Culliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenny Dejohn CULLIVER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's convictions, but, because the trial judge did not enter a written order of his decision to impose adult sanctions on the juvenile appellant, we vacate the appellant's sentences and remand this case for the trial court to issue a nunc pro tunc written order. No new sentencing hearing is required, and the appellant need not be present for the ministerial function of entering a written order that conforms to the judge's oral pronouncement. See Bridgewater v. State, 668 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 So. 2d 1152, 1997 WL 274849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culliver-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.