Drummond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Drummond v. State

713 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9554, 1998 WL 422749

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1998

DocketNo. 98-631

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 713 So. 2d 1126 (Drummond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drummond v. State, 713 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9554, 1998 WL 422749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Hopeton Drummond (“defendant”), appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation and imposing a prison sentence. At the defendant’s probation revocation hearing, the trial court orally revoked probation based upon technical and substantive violations. However, as the State concedes, the trial court erred in failing to enter a written order revoking probation in accordance with the oral pronouncement. See Richardson v. State, 697 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation, but remand for the entry of a written order listing the specific violations of probation. See Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed and remanded for entry of a written order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Hopeton Drummond (“defendant”), appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation and imposing a prison sentence. At the defendant’s probation revocation hearing, the trial court orally revoked probation based upon technical and substantive violations. However, as the State concedes, the trial court erred in failing to enter a written order revoking probation in accordance with the oral pronouncement. See Richardson v. State, 697 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation, but remand for the entry of a written order listing the specific violations of probation. See Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed and remanded for entry of a written order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 So. 2d 1126, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9554, 1998 WL 422749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drummond-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack