Brown v. State

209 S.W.3d 52, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1938, 2006 WL 3718035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1831
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2006·No. No. ED 87212·Published

Opinion

[53]*53 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Anthony F. Brown, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 209 S.W.3d 52, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1938, 2006 WL 3718035 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

209 S.W.3d 52 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.