Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Brown v. State

Brown v. State

156 S.W.3d 529, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 338, 2005 WL 468702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 692 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 2005·No. No. WD 63800·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction by guilty plea to robbery in the second degree, Section 569.030,1 James Brown filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, al[530]*530leging that without an evidentiary hearing the court could not determine if appointed counsel complied with Rule 24.035(e) or had instead abandoned him. On this basis, Brown urges the court to reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing, This court affirms the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 156 S.W.3d 529, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 338, 2005 WL 468702 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

156 S.W.3d 529 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.