Brown v. State
122 S.W.3d 705, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1907, 2003 WL 22889258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 234 →
Opinion
ORDER
Scott Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion submitted on depositions in lieu of an evidentiary hearing.1
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 122 S.W.3d 705, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1907, 2003 WL 22889258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
122 S.W.3d 705 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Brown
984 S.W.2d 535 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Brown
18 S.W.3d 34 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)