Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Brown v. State

Brown v. State

43 S.W.3d 390, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2001 WL 167792
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 234 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2001·No. No. ED 76602·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 43 S.W.3d 390, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2001 WL 167792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

43 S.W.3d 390 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.