Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

43 S.W.3d 390, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2001 WL 167792

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2001

DocketNo. ED 76602

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.W.3d 390 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 43 S.W.3d 390, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2001 WL 167792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.W.3d 390, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2001 WL 167792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-moctapp-2001.