Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

232 S.W.3d 609, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1207, 2007 WL 2471972

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2007·No. ED 89218·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Lamont Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings, conclusions, and judgment are not clearly erroneous. Tillman v. State, 939 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Lamont Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings, conclusions, and judgment are not clearly erroneous. Tillman v. State, 939 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Brown v. State, 232 S.W.3d 609, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1207, 2007 WL 2471972 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

232 S.W.3d 609 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related