Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

211 S.W.3d 164, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 36, 2007 WL 46036

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 2007

DocketED 86981

StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 164 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 211 S.W.3d 164, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 36, 2007 WL 46036 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Brown, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the *165 parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Brown, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the *165 parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.W.3d 164, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 36, 2007 WL 46036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-moctapp-2007.