Brown v. State
This text of 203 S.W.3d 240 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Arlen Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief (Motion). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum to the parties, for their use [241]*241only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 S.W.3d 240, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2006 WL 2864732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-moctapp-2006.