Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Brown v. State

284 S.W.3d 481, 373 Ark. 453, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 330

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 2008

DocketCR 08-127

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 284 S.W.3d 481 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 284 S.W.3d 481, 373 Ark. 453, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 330 (Ark. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard Brown, by and through his attorney, David O. Bowden, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension, Brown’s brief was due on April 23, 2008. On April 22, 2008, Brown timely filed a motion to extend the time in which to file his brief, which we denied on April 23,2008. He then submitted a motion to file a belated brief on April 28, 2008. On May 7, 2008, Brown tendered his brief to this court’s clerk, at which time he also filed an amended and supplemented copy of his motion to file a belated brief.

We will accept a criminal appellant’s belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Wertz v. State, 373 Ark. 260, 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (citing Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242, 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995)). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id. (citing Strom v. State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (per curiam) (holding that appellate counsel’s admitted failure to timely file the brief constituted good cause to grant motion for belated brief)).

Here, Mr. Bowden states in the motion that his client, Richard Brown, was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for life. Furthermore, Mr. Bowden acknowledges his own fault in failing to timely file his brief. In line with current precedent, this court grants Brown’s motion to file belated brief, and we refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard Brown, by and through his attorney, David O. Bowden, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension, Brown’s brief was due on April 23, 2008. On April 22, 2008, Brown timely filed a motion to extend the time in which to file his brief, which we denied on April 23,2008. He then submitted a motion to file a belated brief on April 28, 2008. On May 7, 2008, Brown tendered his brief to this court’s clerk, at which time he also filed an amended and supplemented copy of his motion to file a belated brief.

We will accept a criminal appellant’s belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Wertz v. State, 373 Ark. 260, 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (citing Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242, 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995)). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id. (citing Strom v. State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (per curiam) (holding that appellate counsel’s admitted failure to timely file the brief constituted good cause to grant motion for belated brief)).

Here, Mr. Bowden states in the motion that his client, Richard Brown, was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for life. Furthermore, Mr. Bowden acknowledges his own fault in failing to timely file his brief. In line with current precedent, this court grants Brown’s motion to file belated brief, and we refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 S.W.3d 481, 373 Ark. 453, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-ark-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack