Brown v. Oklahoma

408 U.S. 914, 92 S. Ct. 2507, 33 L. Ed. 2d 326, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1993
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 26, 1972·No. 71-6535·Published·Cited by 44 cases

Opinions

Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Cohen v. California, 403 U. S. 15 (1971), and Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U. S. 518 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Oklahoma, 408 U.S. 914, 92 S. Ct. 2507, 33 L. Ed. 2d 326, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1993 (1972).

408 U.S. 914 (Brown v. Oklahoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pueblo v. García Colón
182 P.R. Dec. 129 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2011)
Jarrett v. Goldman
67 Va. Cir. 361 (Portsmouth County Circuit Court, 2005)
Gatto v. County of Sonoma
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 550 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
Hawkins v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
602 A.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Raymond Wayne Hill v. The City of Houston, Texas
789 F.2d 1103 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Com. v. Ashcraft
691 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Ashcraft
691 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1985)
Diehl v. State
451 A.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
Pueblo v. Caro González
110 P.R. Dec. 518 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1980)
State v. John W.
418 A.2d 1097 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)
Frolik v. State
392 So. 2d 845 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.
263 N.W.2d 412 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Matter of Welfare of SLJ
263 N.W.2d 412 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Downs v. State
366 A.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Duncan
363 A.2d 803 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Jefferson v. Superior Court
51 Cal. App. 3d 721 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)