Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 2011

Docket2011-3044

StatusUnpublished

This text of Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential ' United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit DONNA BROWN, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3044 _ Petition for review of the Merit SysteIns Protection Board in case no. CH07521{){)371-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0tecti0n Board as the respondent, IT IS ORDERED TI-IAT2 (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is reflected above

BROWN V. MSPB 2 (2) Donna BroWn's opening brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.* The requirement that Brown file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement is waived in this case. FoR THE CoURT 1 /s/ Jan Horbal_v Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Donna Brown (inforn1al brief form enclosed) Elisha C. Seaton, Esq. Sara B. Rearden, Esq. faa ll/if l 1 2011 s20 JAI|`HORBALY CLERK " Initially it appeared that BroWn had filed a brief when she filed her petition for review. However, the court does not have any copies of her brief on file. lf Brown has a copy of a previously submitted brief, she may file it with the court and it will be accepted for filing If Brown did not previously file a brief, we have enclosed the informal brief form which may be used to prepare her brief Brown should send to counsel for the Merit Systems Protection Board a copy of the brief that she mails to this court. Counsel's address is: Sara B. Rearden, Esq. Merit Systems Protection Board 1615 M. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 204l9

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential ' United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit DONNA BROWN, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3044 _ Petition for review of the Merit SysteIns Protection Board in case no. CH07521{){)371-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0tecti0n Board as the respondent, IT IS ORDERED TI-IAT2 (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is reflected above

BROWN V. MSPB 2 (2) Donna BroWn's opening brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.* The requirement that Brown file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement is waived in this case. FoR THE CoURT 1 /s/ Jan Horbal_v Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Donna Brown (inforn1al brief form enclosed) Elisha C. Seaton, Esq. Sara B. Rearden, Esq. faa ll/if l 1 2011 s20 JAI|`HORBALY CLERK " Initially it appeared that BroWn had filed a brief when she filed her petition for review. However, the court does not have any copies of her brief on file. lf Brown has a copy of a previously submitted brief, she may file it with the court and it will be accepted for filing If Brown did not previously file a brief, we have enclosed the informal brief form which may be used to prepare her brief Brown should send to counsel for the Merit Systems Protection Board a copy of the brief that she mails to this court. Counsel's address is: Sara B. Rearden, Esq. Merit Systems Protection Board 1615 M. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 204l9

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.