Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region v. Union Pacific Railroad

537 F.3d 789, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17111, 2008 WL 3271973
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 11, 2008·No. 06-2542·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On April 23, 2008, plaintiff-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing en banc, and on May 16, 2008, defendant-appellee filed an answer to the petition. All of the judges on the panel voted to deny rehearing. No judge in regular active service has called for a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The petition is therefore Denied. Chief Judge Easterbrook concurs in the denial of rehearing en banc. His concurrence, in which Judge Posner joins, is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region v. Union Pacific Railroad, 537 F.3d 789, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17111, 2008 WL 3271973 (7th Cir. 2008).

537 F.3d 789 (Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region v. Union Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related