Brooks v. State
655 So. 2d 238, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6009, 1995 WL 331470
Opinion
Appellant claims that the trial court imper-missibly ordered restitution upon resentenc-ing following remand from this court, where no restitution was imposed at the original sentencing. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of restitution. See Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied 591 So.2d 184 (Fla.1991); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State, 655 So. 2d 238, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6009, 1995 WL 331470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
655 So. 2d 238 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. State
710 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)