Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Abt v. State

Abt v. State

581 So. 2d 1001, 1991 WL 117014
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1991·No. 90-3068·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

581 So.2d 1001 (1991)

Alan Andrew ABT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-3068.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 3, 1991.
Certification and Rehearing July 31, 1991.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence except for that part of the sentence that imposes restitution. We hold that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhanced sentence. See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); see also Morganti v. State, 573 So.2d 820 (Fla. 1991). We reverse the imposition of restitution and remand with instructions for the trial court vacate that part of the sentence. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abt v. State, 581 So. 2d 1001, 1991 WL 117014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

581 So. 2d 1001 (Abt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State
710 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Brooks v. State
655 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Savory v. State
600 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Jones v. State
590 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)