Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brooks v. State

622 So. 2d 192, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8628, 1993 WL 310703

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 605 So. 2d 874 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1993·No. No. 92-541·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed, except to the extent that the judgment indicates that appellant was adjudged a habitual violent offender. This cause is remanded to the trial court so that the written judgment can be corrected to indicate that the appellant was adjudged and sentenced as a habitual felony offender, rather than as a habitual violent felony offender.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed, except to the extent that the judgment indicates that appellant was adjudged a habitual violent offender. This cause is remanded to the trial court so that the written judgment can be corrected to indicate that the appellant was adjudged and sentenced as a habitual felony offender, rather than as a habitual violent felony offender.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Brooks v. State, 622 So. 2d 192, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8628, 1993 WL 310703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

622 So. 2d 192 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.