Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brooks v. State

577 So. 2d 680, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1991 WL 44995

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2279

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 577 So. 2d 680 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. State, 577 So. 2d 680, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1991 WL 44995 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

In this case in which the defendant was found guilty of DUI manslaughter, the jury was instructed that the presence of “.10 per cent or more by weight of alcohol in the [defendant’s] blood ... shall be pri-ma facie evidence that the person was under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired.” We reverse.

We must follow the dictates of the Florida Supreme Court which recently has unequivocally held that such an instruction is reversible error. Wilhelm v. State, 568 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990).

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI