Brooks v. State

577 So. 2d 680, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1991 WL 44995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1991·No. No. 90-2279·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

In this case in which the defendant was found guilty of DUI manslaughter, the jury was instructed that the presence of “.10 per cent or more by weight of alcohol in the [defendant’s] blood ... shall be pri-ma facie evidence that the person was under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired.” We reverse.

We must follow the dictates of the Florida Supreme Court which recently has unequivocally held that such an instruction is reversible error. Wilhelm v. State, 568 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990).

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 577 So. 2d 680, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1991 WL 44995 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

577 So. 2d 680 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dejerez v. State
580 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Roland
577 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)