Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State

626 So. 2d 1066, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433, 1993 WL 461968
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 605 So. 2d 874 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1993·No. No. 92-04138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for robbery. However, we remand for resentencing within the guidelines, because the trial court imposed a guideline departure sentence without providing contemporaneous written reasons justifying the departure. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

FRANK, C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 626 So. 2d 1066, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433, 1993 WL 461968 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 1066 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)