Breen v. Mineta
This text of Breen v. Mineta (Breen v. Mineta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) KATHLEEN BREEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-0654 (PLF) ) ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of ) Transportation, Department of ) Transportation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion [Dkt. No. 316] of fifteen prospective plaintiffs to
reconsider this Court’s prior orders denying them leave to join or, in the alternative, intervene in
the above-captioned case is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs may file an amended complaint adding the
movants as plaintiffs to this case on or before April 10, 2018.
SO ORDERED.
_________/s/_______________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: March 27, 2018 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Breen v. Mineta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breen-v-mineta-dcd-2018.