Breen v. Mineta
This text of Breen v. Mineta (Breen v. Mineta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) KATHLEEN BREEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-0654 (PLF) ) ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of ) Transportation, Department of ) Transportation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion [Dkt. No. 400] to reinstate all individuals
who have expressed their intention to participate as plaintiffs in this case is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED as to Kendra K.
Chapman. Kendra K. Chapman, listed in Exhibit A of Dkt. No. 403, is denied reinstatement in
this case; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED as to the 211
other individuals listed in Exhibit A of Dkt. No. 403. For the reasons explained in the
accompanying Opinion, those 211 individuals are either reinstated or permitted to join as
plaintiffs in this case; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the prior motions filed by plaintiffs [Dkt. Nos. 383,
385] have been incorporated into plaintiffs’ instant motion [Dkt. No. 400], and therefore, by this
Order, are GRANTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED as to the three
individuals who were voluntarily dismissed from this case, listed in Exhibit B of Dkt. No. 400;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that any additional prospective plaintiffs – whether they
seek reconsideration of the Court’s prior denial of their joinder or were previously dismissed
from the case – that move to be reinstated in this case following the issuance of this Order and
the accompanying Opinion must show good cause as to why they did not meet the Court’s prior
deadlines.
SO ORDERED.
_______________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: March 21, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Breen v. Mineta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breen-v-mineta-dcd-2019.