Boyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boyd v. State

466 S.W.3d 565, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 2015 WL 1119688

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. ED 101257·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James Boyd appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum-setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James Boyd appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum-setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2014).

Boyd v. State, 466 S.W.3d 565, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 2015 WL 1119688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

466 S.W.3d 565 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.