Boyd v. State

383 S.W.3d 479, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2012 WL 5476827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2012·No. No. ED 97542·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Darnell Boyd, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after [480]*480an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 383 S.W.3d 479, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2012 WL 5476827 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

383 S.W.3d 479 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.