Boyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boyd v. State

364 S.W.3d 272, 2012 WL 1339993, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 518

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2012

DocketED 97353

StatusPublished

This text of 364 S.W.3d 272 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyd v. State, 364 S.W.3d 272, 2012 WL 1339993, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 518 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Megale Boyd, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Megale Boyd, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 S.W.3d 272, 2012 WL 1339993, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-moctapp-2012.