Boyd v. State

303 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2009 WL 4840938
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 2009
DocketED 93286
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 571 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. State, 303 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2009 WL 4840938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Boyd (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open his post-conviction case.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. State
303 S.W.3d 571 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2009 WL 4840938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-moctapp-2009.