Boyd v. State

303 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2009 WL 4840938
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. ED 93286·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Boyd (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open his post-conviction case.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 303 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2009 WL 4840938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

303 S.W.3d 571 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
303 S.W.3d 571 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)