Boyd v. State
505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733
This text of 505 S.W.3d 863 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boyd v. State, 505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER
Thomas Boyd appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. Boyd argues that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea, and that his two claims for ineffective assistance of counsel were not refuted by . the record as found by the [864]*864motion court. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-moctapp-2016.