Boyd v. State
505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733
Opinion
ORDER
Thomas Boyd appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. Boyd argues that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea, and that his two claims for ineffective assistance of counsel were not refuted by . the record as found by the [864] motion court. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyd v. State, 505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
505 S.W.3d 863 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.