Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff

Fifth Circuit

Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff

561 F.2d 630

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 1977

Docket76-1065

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 561 F.2d 630 (Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff, 561 F.2d 630 (5th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant points out that our prior opinion did not expressly deal with his contentions of systematic exclusion of blacks, women, and citizens 18 through 24 years of age from jury service; the right to a hearing on his second special plea of insanity; the delay in bringing a second indictment which violated his rights to a speedy trial; the delay of his retrial past the time set in a prior federal habeas order; and denial of counsel. Each of these matters was thoroughly considered by the panel and found to be lacking in merit.

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled en banc, (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant points out that our prior opinion did not expressly deal with his contentions of systematic exclusion of blacks, women, and citizens 18 through 24 years of age from jury service; the right to a hearing on his second special plea of insanity; the delay in bringing a second indictment which violated his rights to a speedy trial; the delay of his retrial past the time set in a prior federal habeas order; and denial of counsel. Each of these matters was thoroughly considered by the panel and found to be lacking in merit.

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled en banc, (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 F.2d 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-hardwick-v-ollie-doolittle-jailer-and-william-anderson-sheriff-ca5-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack