Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
This text of 528 N.E.2d 1225 (Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*890 OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified not answered as unnecessary. In view of the undisputed evidence that a direct safe route to the bus was available to plaintiff, the bus company may not be held liable for plaintiff’s injuries (see, MacKenzie v Union Ry. Co., 82 App Div 124, affd 178 NY 638).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 N.E.2d 1225, 72 N.Y.2d 888, 532 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blye-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-ny-1988.