MacKenzie v. . Union Railway Company of New York City
71 N.E. 1134, 178 N.Y. 638, 16 Bedell 638, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 911
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MacKenzie v. . Union Railway Company of New York City, 71 N.E. 1134, 178 N.Y. 638, 16 Bedell 638, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 911 (N.Y. 1904).
71 N.E. 1134 (MacKenzie v. . Union Railway Company of New York City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ausderan v. City of New York
219 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
528 N.E.2d 1225 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
124 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Sheridan v. City of New York
159 N.E.2d 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
Schwartz v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
264 A.D. 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Keener v. Tilton
28 N.E.2d 912 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Kenwell v. Lee
142 Misc. 413 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)
Haas v. Wichita Railroad & Light Co.
132 P. 195 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)