Jacobs v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.

2019 NY Slip Op 3689
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2019
Docket9287 154652/14E
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3689 (Jacobs v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 2019 NY Slip Op 3689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Jacobs v Metropolitan Transp. Auth. (2019 NY Slip Op 03689)
Jacobs v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.
2019 NY Slip Op 03689
Decided on May 9, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 9, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

9287 154652/14E

[*1]Sander Jacobs, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Morelli Law Firm PLLC, New York (Sara A. Mahoney of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (James M. Strauss of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered April 13, 2018, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured while attempting to disembark a bus from the rear emergency door. The record shows that defendants satisfied the duty of a common carrier to provide a clear, direct

and safe path of egress, namely the front door of the bus (see Abraham v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 29 AD3d 345, 347 [1st Dept 2006]; Blye v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 124 AD2d 106, 109 [1st Dept 1987], affd 72 NY2d 888 [1988]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 9, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
528 N.E.2d 1225 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Abraham v. Port Authority
29 A.D.3d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
124 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-metropolitan-transp-auth-nyappdiv-2019.