Blount v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blount v. State

238 So. 3d 913

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 2018

DocketCase No. 2D17–1949

StatusPublished

Cited by22 cases

This text of 238 So. 3d 913 (Blount v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rachaun Blount appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he argued that he was entitled to resentencing with respect to his forty-year concurrent sentences for nonhomicide offenses that he committed when he was sixteen years old. The State correctly concedes that Mr. Blount is entitled to resentencing, and we reverse the order denying Mr. Blount's motion and remand for resentencing under the new juvenile sentencing guidelines¹ in accordance with *914Johnson v. State, 215 So.3d 1237 (Fla. 2017), and Mosier v. State, 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 13, 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rachaun Blount appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he argued that he was entitled to resentencing with respect to his forty-year concurrent sentences for nonhomicide offenses that he committed when he was sixteen years old. The State correctly concedes that Mr. Blount is entitled to resentencing, and we reverse the order denying Mr. Blount's motion and remand for resentencing under the new juvenile sentencing guidelines¹ in accordance with *914Johnson v. State, 215 So.3d 1237 (Fla. 2017), and Mosier v. State, 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 13, 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 So. 3d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blount-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack