Blount v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blount v. State

238 So. 3d 913

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2018·No. Case No. 2D17–1949·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rachaun Blount appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he argued that he was entitled to resentencing with respect to his forty-year concurrent sentences for nonhomicide offenses that he committed when he was sixteen years old. The State correctly concedes that Mr. Blount is entitled to resentencing, and we reverse the order denying Mr. Blount's motion and remand for resentencing under the new juvenile sentencing guidelines¹ in accordance with *914Johnson v. State, 215 So.3d 1237 (Fla. 2017), and Mosier v. State, 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 13, 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rachaun Blount appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he argued that he was entitled to resentencing with respect to his forty-year concurrent sentences for nonhomicide offenses that he committed when he was sixteen years old. The State correctly concedes that Mr. Blount is entitled to resentencing, and we reverse the order denying Mr. Blount's motion and remand for resentencing under the new juvenile sentencing guidelines¹ in accordance with *914Johnson v. State, 215 So.3d 1237 (Fla. 2017), and Mosier v. State, 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 13, 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

238 So. 3d 913 (Blount v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related