Donahue v. State

257 So. 3d 1083
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 2018·No. No. 4D18-2148·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion for resentencing hearing, challenging the thirty-year sentences imposed following convictions for second degree murder and robbery.

We affirm based on Hart v. State , 246 So.3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc) and Pedroza v. State , 244 So.3d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). As we did in Hart and Pedroza , we certify conflict with Cuevas v. State , 241 So.3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), Blount v. State , 238 So.3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), Mosier v. State , 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), Alfaro v. State , 233 So.3d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), and Burrows v. State , 219 So.3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). We also certify conflict with Katwaroo v. State , 237 So.3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) and Tarrand v. State , 199 So.3d 507 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

Warner, Damoorgian and Ciklin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donahue v. State, 257 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

257 So. 3d 1083 (Donahue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BRYAN C. DONAHUE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
THOMAS LEWIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
JAMES WARTHEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
265 So. 3d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)