Stanley Tarrand v. State
This text of Stanley Tarrand v. State (Stanley Tarrand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
STANLEY TARRAND,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-4400
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 10, 2016
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge.
Stanley Tarrand, Avon Park, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Stanley Tarrand appeals an order denying his successive motion for
postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We
affirm.
Tarrand contends that his fifty-one-year sentence, agreed to as part of a plea
agreement, for second-degree murder, committed in 1994 when he was fifteen years old, is a de facto life sentence that does not provide a meaningful opportunity for relief.
Tarrand argues that his sentence is unconstitutional under the holdings of Miller v.
Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and seeks
resentencing pursuant to section 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2015). The trial court
denied Tarrand’s motion, holding that he “is eligible for early release,” and “has failed to
show that his sentence exceeds his life expectancy and is thus a de facto life sentence.”
Because Tarrand committed his crime in 1994, he is, as the trial court correctly found,
eligible for early release, due to his potential to accrue significant gain time.1 See §
921.001(10)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1994). Thus, because he has a meaningful opportunity for
early release, we affirm the trial court’s order.
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
1Tarrand will be sixty-six years old if he serves one hundred percent of his sentence. However, because he is eligible for early release, his tentative release date is in 2019 when he will be forty-one-years old. Accordingly, we do not address whether Tarrand’s sentence is a de facto life sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanley Tarrand v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-tarrand-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.