Seays v. State

253 So. 3d 21
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2018·No. No. 4D18-1827·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed . See Hart v. State , 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc). We again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State , 241 So.3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Blount v. State , 238 So.3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Mosier v. State , 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; Alfaro v. State , 233 So.3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; and Burrows v. State , 219 So.3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

May, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seays v. State, 253 So. 3d 21 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

253 So. 3d 21 (Seays v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DEVON SEAYS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Jackson v. State
267 So. 3d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
VAN JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019