VAN JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
VAN JACKSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-3473
[March 6, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-12227CF10A.
Van Jackson, Carrabelle, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hart v. State, 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc); Seays v. State, 253 So. 3d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State, 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State, 235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State, 233 So. 3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State, 219 So. 3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
VAN JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (VAN JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.