Home/U.S. Customs Court/Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 885
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 1967
DocketNo. P67/308
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 885 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 885 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Cust. Ct. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomingdale-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1967.