Home/U.S. Customs Court/Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 325, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2143
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1965
DocketNo. 69082; protest 63/4389 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 325 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 325, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2143 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric coffee grinders and that the merchandise and issues are analogous to those involved in Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), and United States v. Electrolux Corporation (46 CCPA 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 85 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 325, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomingdale-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1965.