Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 429, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1928
United States Customs Court·Decided May 6, 1965·No. No. 69294; protest 64/18641 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 429, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1928 (cusc 1965).
54 Cust. Ct. 429 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)