Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 398, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1749
United States Customs Court·Decided July 26, 1965·No. No. 69466; protest 64/8470 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric coffee grinders and that said articles and the issues involved herein are analogous to those in Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), and United States v. Electrolux Corporation (46 CCPA 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 398, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1749 (cusc 1965).
55 Cust. Ct. 398 (Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 85 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)