Blocker v. Board of Education of Manhasset, New York

226 F. Supp. 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8373
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1964
Docket62-C-285
StatusPublished
Cited by45 cases

This text of 226 F. Supp. 208 (Blocker v. Board of Education of Manhasset, New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blocker v. Board of Education of Manhasset, New York, 226 F. Supp. 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8373 (E.D.N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

JOSEPH C. ZAVATT, Chief Judge.

The Complaint

This is a class action instituted by several Negro minors who reside within Union Free School District No. 6,. Manhasset, New York (the District), *209 against the Board of Education of the District (sued herein as The Board of Education of Manhasset, New York), its members and its Superintendent of Schools. The plaintiffs allege that they and the members of their class are discriminated against by the defendants by being racially segregated in the use and enjoyment of the public schools of the District; that the defendants are denying them their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States 1 and the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. 2 They seek a declaratory judgment to the effect that the rules, regulations and procedures of the Board are unconstitutional because they require, permit or sanction racially segregated public schools. They seek, further, a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from continuing to enforce these rules, regulations and procedures; from assigning them to a racially segregated school; requiring the defendants to eliminate patterns of racial segregation; to submit a desegregation plan and to delineate and maintain new school attendance areas for the purpose of creating and perpetuating positive racial integration patterns. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 (3). 3

*210 The District

The Manhasset School District, comprising an area of approximately five and one half square miles, is shown on the following map:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogaciu v. Makkos
S.D. New York, 2020
Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21
383 F. Supp. 699 (E.D. New York, 1974)
Thomas v. Ford Motor Company
396 F. Supp. 52 (E.D. Michigan, 1973)
People Ex Rel. Lynch v. San Diego Unified School District
19 Cal. App. 3d 252 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
San Francisco Unified School District v. Johnson
479 P.2d 669 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
Keyes v. School District Number One, Denver, Colorado
303 F. Supp. 279 (D. Colorado, 1969)
Roberson v. Great American Insurance
48 F.R.D. 404 (N.D. Georgia, 1969)
Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Board of Education
298 F. Supp. 213 (D. Connecticut, 1969)
Bryant v. Board of Education
274 F. Supp. 270 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester School District
233 A.2d 290 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen
269 F. Supp. 401 (District of Columbia, 1967)
Offermann v. Nitkowski
378 F.2d 22 (Second Circuit, 1967)
Johnson v. Hunger
266 F. Supp. 590 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Tina Deal v. The Cincinnati Board of Education
369 F.2d 55 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F. Supp. 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blocker-v-board-of-education-of-manhasset-new-york-nyed-1964.