Bird v. Maass

800 P.2d 794, 104 Or. App. 301, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1478
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 7, 1990
Docket90C-10636; CA A64584
StatusPublished

This text of 800 P.2d 794 (Bird v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bird v. Maass, 800 P.2d 794, 104 Or. App. 301, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1478 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the court erred in dismissing the writ after it had been issued. We reverse and remand for the reasons stated in a similar case involving the same parties. Bird v. Maass (A64583), 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bird v. Maass
800 P.2d 792 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
800 P.2d 794, 104 Or. App. 301, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-maass-orctapp-1990.