Umtuch v. Board of Parole
818 P.2d 1300, 109 Or. App. 481, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1601
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 30, 1991
Docket90-C12069, 90-C-12069; CA A67210, A67370
StatusPublished
This text of 818 P.2d 1300 (Umtuch v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Umtuch v. Board of Parole, 818 P.2d 1300, 109 Or. App. 481, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1601 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
In this habeas corpus action,1 the trial court, on its own motion after the writ was issued, dismissed it before defendant had filed a return. The state has conceded by a letter waiving its appearance that that was error. Bird v. Maass, 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990). We accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bird v. Maass
800 P.2d 792 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
818 P.2d 1300, 109 Or. App. 481, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umtuch-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-1991.