Umtuch v. Board of Parole
818 P.2d 1300, 109 Or. App. 481, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1601
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 30, 1991·No. 90-C12069, 90-C-12069; CA A67210, A67370·Published
Opinion
In this habeas corpus action,1 the trial court, on its own motion after the writ was issued, dismissed it before defendant had filed a return. The state has conceded by a letter waiving its appearance that that was error. Bird v. Maass, 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990). We accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Umtuch v. Board of Parole, 818 P.2d 1300, 109 Or. App. 481, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1601 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
818 P.2d 1300 (Umtuch v. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bird v. Maass
800 P.2d 792 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)