Home/Supreme Court/Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.

Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.

366 U.S. 211, 81 S. Ct. 1091, 6 L. Ed. 2d 239, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2117, 129 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 175
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 8, 1961
Docket501
StatusPublished
Cited by51 cases

This text of 366 U.S. 211 (Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp., 366 U.S. 211, 81 S. Ct. 1091, 6 L. Ed. 2d 239, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2117, 129 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 175 (1961).

Opinion

366 U.S. 211 (1961)

BINKS MANUFACTURING CO.
v.
RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP.

No. 501.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued May 3-4, 1961.
Decided May 8, 1961.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

W. Donald McSweeney and Charles F. Meroni argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs were Otto R. Krause and John B. Robinson, Jr.

Elbert R. Gilliom argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were James P. Hume and Harry T. Ice.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Richard A. Solomon filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. Smith
591 A.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1991)
United States Lines, Inc. v. GAC Marine Fuels Ltd. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)
76 B.R. 291 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. Phillips
710 F.2d 292 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Deere & Co. v. International Harvester Co.
460 F. Supp. 523 (S.D. Illinois, 1978)
United States v. Wayne Earl Ellison
557 F.2d 128 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Lansing Board of Education
429 F. Supp. 583 (W.D. Michigan, 1976)
Andrews, Mosburg, Davis, Elam, Legg & Bixler, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of America
418 F. Supp. 304 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1976)
Ransburg Corp. v. Automatic Finishing Systems, Inc.
412 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Logal v. Cruse
338 N.E.2d 309 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1975)
Sears, Sucsy & Co. v. Insurance Company of No. Amer.
392 F. Supp. 398 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
WR Grace & Co. v. Park Manufacturing Company
378 F. Supp. 976 (E.D. Illinois, 1974)
United States v. State of Missouri
363 F. Supp. 739 (E.D. Missouri, 1973)
Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education
466 F.2d 1213 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Texas Education Agency (Austin Independent School District)
467 F.2d 848 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Jose Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Independent School District
467 F.2d 142 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Roy v. Jones
349 F. Supp. 315 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)
La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.
445 F.2d 84 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
Stout v. United States
448 F.2d 403 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Teledyne Mid-America Corp. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
325 F. Supp. 424 (D. Rhode Island, 1971)
United States v. State of Texas
321 F. Supp. 1043 (E.D. Texas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 U.S. 211, 81 S. Ct. 1091, 6 L. Ed. 2d 239, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2117, 129 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binks-mfg-co-v-ransburg-electro-coating-corp-scotus-1961.