Beuttas v. United States

Court of Claims

Beuttas v. United States

77 F. Supp. 937, 111 Ct. Cl. 551, 1948 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 60

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 1, 1948

DocketNos. 47867 and 47868

StatusPublished

This text of 77 F. Supp. 937 (Beuttas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beuttas v. United States, 77 F. Supp. 937, 111 Ct. Cl. 551, 1948 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 60 (cc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Howell, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts and circumstances in these two cases are identical with those in the case of Joseph H. Beuttas et al., No. 47866, with the exception of the date of execution of the contracts, the location of the particular projects, and the amount of additional costs sought to be recovered.

What we have said with reference to the above case applies equally to these two cases and accordingly, the defendant’s demurrer in each case is overruled.

It is so ordered.

MaddeN, Judge; Whitaker, Judge] Littleton, Judges and Jones, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI