Berry v. Allgood
This text of 672 S.W.2d 74 (Berry v. Allgood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Smith in his opinion for the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, copy of which is appended.
There is no conflict between the conclusions of the majority and the cases of Kennedy v. Holladay, 105 Mo. 24, 16 S.W. 688 (1891); and McGraw v. O’Neil, 123 Mo.App. 691, 101 S.W. 132 (1907), cited by the dissenting judge in certifying the case to us. Both of those cases hold that the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in determining that the contact with jurors there shown did not require new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
672 S.W.2d 74, 1984 Mo. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-allgood-mo-1984.